From: Robert Powell <rpowell.nul> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:12:47 -0500 Archived: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:16:40 -0400 Subject: Re: UFO files #8 Released By UK National Archives >From: Don Ledger<dledger.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:02:03 -0300 >Subject: Re: UFO files #8 Released By UK National Archives >>From: Joe McGonagle<joe.mcgonagle.nul> >>To: post.nul >>Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:15:35 +0100 >>Subject: Re: UFO files #8 Released By UK National Archives >>>From: Stanton T. Friedman<fsphys.nul> >>>To:<post.nul> >>>Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:05:09 -0300 >>>Subject: Re: UFO files #8 Released By UK National Archives >>>To those who have reviewed the MOD files, would it be correct to >>>assume that no TOP SECRET Files have been released? >>None that haven't been redacted(including their security >>markings) - do you expect there to be some? >Considering the efforts that you, David and others had to put >into getting the MoD files released in the first place and which >have been coming out in clumps for some years now would it not >make sense that the RAF's inability to guarantee the UK's >airspace would likely produce some embarrassing cases that might >be held back? >The United States and Canada have done the same and all three >have parroted one another with the claim that these unidentified >objects pose no threat to national security. >On August 4 in Washington, DC two F-16s intercepted a 75 year >old woman flying a 60 horsepower J-3 Piper Cub (a rag wing as we >call them) when she drifted into restricted airspace over >Chicago (she didn't get the NOTAM) because President Obama was >there for his birthday celebration. The pilot, Myrtle Rose >thought they flew by to admire her pretty little Cub but she was >met by the police when she landed. >Myrtle was no threat to national security either but they chased >her anyway when NORAD reported her straying into the Secret >Service's paranoia zone. The radar signature of a J-3 Cub is >pretty small. Cars below pass J-3s on the four lane highways. >Flying close over top of a J-3 with an F-16 would destroy it by >the way. >One wonders if Ms Rose was able to suddenly warp away at Mach 15 >in her J-3 Cub, out maneuver her F-16 persuit, avoid being shot >down would she then NOT be a threat to national security? Would >it then be classified Top Secret because it is too embarrassing >to release to the public; claimed not a threat to national >security; or redacted to the point of un-readability? Don, I think the military attitude towards UFOs is similar to Sergeant Schultz on the old TV series Hogan's Heroes. Whenever he was confronted with a problem that he did not, or was not, able to deal with, he would reply, "I know nothing! I see nothing!" >It appears that if these air forces can't catch or out maneuver >an unidentified flying object then said object is no longer a >threat to national security. During WWII it was imperative to >have air superiority over Europe and Japan in order for the >allies to win. >Funny how times change. >Don Ledger It is similar to our foreign policy. When someone kills their civilians such as Libya... someone we can easily deal with... then we bomb them. Someone with a stronger military such as Iran, then we just condemn their actions. So extrapolate said policy to the next level and 'ignoring' the issue becomes the next step. Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp