From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 08:04:28 +0100 Archived: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 07:49:55 -0400 Subject: Don't Smear The Belgian Data Hello List We're getting a lot of 'noise' about the Belgian Triangles. The Belgian data seem to be clear, well observed - by multiple qualified witnesses, police, ground radars, air-radars and pilots etc - and unusually well recorded and well-researched by military and scientific authorities. But folk are now allowing themselves to talk about the "Belgian UFO Hoax" based on an 'illustration' (don't let's dignify it by calling it a photo) which someone used at some later stage. Do we call NASA and ESA reports 'hoaxes' because they often use artist's illustrations? Here's some Belgian Triangle data found on Youtube: Belgium UFO Triangle Sightings Pt 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4JsPSKYypk Pt2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-f-3eABbdU Cheers Ray D BTW - In Pt 1 you'll see that one guy who filmed the triangle was pressured (unsuccessfully) to say it was a normal aircraft. Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp