From: Cathy Reason <CathyM.nul> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:28:36 +0100 Archived: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:47:41 -0400 Subject: Re: Trindade 'Negative Witness' Found >From: Kentaro Mori <kentaro.mori.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 10:34:01 -0300 >Subject: Re: Trindade 'Negative Witness' Found <snip> >Actually, I'm surprised that no believer has yet come with the >interpretation that the easiest and less "damaging" way to >interpret Jansen's and Brito's testimony is simply to claim >they, like all the six other negative witnesses, didn't arrive >in time. I'm also surprised that no-one seems to have mentioned another, much more obvious possibility - the poor spatial resolution of human peripheral vision. To see a small, fast-moving object, you need both to be looking in the right direction and to be following the object accurately enough to keep the image positioned on the high-resolution portion of the retina. This is not as easy as it sounds, as anyone who has tried to catch sight of a fast jet in the sky will be aware. Otherwise you won't see the object no matter how good your eyesight is. Cathy Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp