From: Alfred Lehmberg <alienview.nul> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:51:39 -0500 Archived: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:11:26 -0400 Subject: Re: Trindade 'Negative Witness' Found >From: John Rimmer <johnrimmer.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:34:55 +0100 (BST) >Subject: Re: Trindade 'Negative Witness' Found >>From: Kentaro Mori <kentaro.mori.nul> >>To: post.nul >>Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:30:51 -0300 >>Subject: Trindade 'Negative Witness' Found >Game, set and match. Really?! You spout facile nonsense and know same. One, even in _your_ plus column, is not a sample as you know. See, pretend it's 2025 and one still lucid old man comes forward who can prove he was in Dallas, November 22, 1963. He testifies that he saw JFK shoot _himself_. See the problem? You're a canted 'Nibbler' Mr. Rimmer. Well, nibble at seven categories of compelling evidence that what _you_ find most 'unsettling' is more obviously true that not. Yes! Wholly unconsidered and even ignored by these you, and inexplicably duped to insentience, apparently, by "fringe morons and intellectual lightweights," is a _massive_ evidentiary pathway known across seven categories to include (1) the Historical textual documents glyphed in soot and cut into stone or otherwise writ in ancient inks on cracking vellum, (2) the extant Artistic Historical from primitives on the walls of their caves, through Middle-Age wood-cuts, to the masterpieces of the masters on rough canvas and slick gesso later on (3) the quality Anecdotal reports backed up by multiple vetted witnesses and corresponding radar (4) genuine Photographic efforts prior to digital photography provided by Dr. Bruce Maccabee, et sig al (5) extant Physical Traces of landing UFOs as laboriously outlined by Ted Phillips and others (6) the "wholly Personal" evidence, if you have any as I do and (7) even the Mathematical, Mr. Rimmer, as it is described in modern physics regarding the consequences of satisfying requirements accounting for "the formality of the actual occurrence" of something 'physical' in this not understood multi-verse (humanity 'happened' so "others" must similarly have 'happened') but, specifically, as it is described in Probability One by Amir D. Aczel, PhD. Alien intelligence, Mr. Rimmer, is a certainty! Moreover, the evidence-entirely if ironically in concert with Fermi-is that they _are_ here. Your _yet inconclusive_ sample of "one" is entirely overshadowed, Sir. It is _you_ ignoring the 500 pound gorilla in the room, Mr. Rimmer. I do 3500 words in an upcoming UFO Magazine on this subject. Stay tuned. Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp