From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:52:25 -0300 Archived: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:03:20 -0400 Subject: Re: Linda Cortile's Open Letter To Carol Rainey >From: Emma Woods <e.woods33.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 06:44:32 -0700 (PDT) >Subject: Re: Linda Cortile's Open Letter To Carol Rainey >>From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:47:18 -0300 >>Subject: Re: Linda Cortile's Open Letter To Carol Rainey >>>From: Jason Gammon <boyinthemachine.nul> >>>To: post.nul >>>Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:34:08 -0400 (EDT) >>>Subject: Re: Linda Cortile's Open Letter To Carol Rainey >>>>From: Emma Woods <e.woods33.nul> >>>>To: post.nul >>>>Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 20:37:22 -0700 (PDT) >>>>Subject: Re: Linda Cortile's Open Letter To Carol Rainey >>>>I wonder whether people who perpetrate long term >>>>hoaxes like this have a similar modus operandi. It >>>>would be interesting to work out what the patterns >>>>are. >>>I was under the impression that no more posts on the >>>subject of your allegations would be allowed. "Fake >>>name Emma", please refrain from sneakily trying to >>>insert them in a reply for another subject. >>Additionally to the last, since when has it been proven that >>the Cortile Case was a hoax? Is this just a proclamation or >>is there some proof of a hoax other than Fake Emma just >>saying so? >Good heavens. >You do realize that 'Linda Cortile' is a pseudonym as well? As >is 'Elizabeth Smith'. Budd accidentally gave out her last name at some conference back in the late 90s if I remember correctly. I know her real last name, It starts with Nap. >I respect the right of both Linda and Elizabeth to use >pseudonyms publicly to protect themselves and their families. I >would never expect them to disclose their real names publicly. >Nor would I gratuitously insult them for using a pseudonym. >I have the same right to use a pseudonym to protect my family >and myself. >For the record, Dr. Jacobs knows my name, address and phone >number, he has certified copies of my birth certificate and >passport, copies of some of my medical records, photos and >videos of me, the names and photos of my relatives and friends, >and so on. >I am only anonymous in public, like many other experiencers. I have no problem with anonymity, I've written about abductees in one of my books and protected their names as well. The problem I have in your case is we know the accused's name as Dave Jacobs while the person who is making the acusations remains annonymous. Don't you find it odd that Jacobs has not revealed your real name despite your public accusations? If he has, I'm not aware of it. >I am pointing out the similarities between Linda and Elizabeth's >responses to the insiders who saw through their claims and >exposed it publicly. I think that the similarities are >interesting. So there are no documents just a "he said she said" situation. It has not been definitively proved a hoax. Don Ledger Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp