From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:52:21 +0000 Archived: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 09:26:56 -0400 Subject: Re: Priests Of High Strangeness - II >From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:08:57 +0200 >Subject: Re: Priests Of High Strangeness - II >>From: Franck Boitte <franckboitte.nul> >>To: post.nul >>Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 16:06:53 +0200 >>Subject: Re: Priests Of High Strangeness - II >>>From: Kathy Kasten<catraja.nul> >>>To:<post.nul> >>>Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 19:15:36 +0000 >>>Subject: Re: Priests Of High Strangeness - II >>>I am still wondering what your friend Marie has to do with >>>anything. Did you want to brag about knowing her? Fine, but why >>>connect her to Hopkins. The discussion is about Linda - which >>>you now state you do not know. >>Ms. Kasten, List, >>Mrs Marie-Therese de Brosses has to date authored the only >>existing documenting french book on abductions. That's why she >>is still regarded over here by people like Mr. Bourdais an a few >>others like him as some sort of "abductionist guru", "prophet" >>or if you like to call her like that, "[French] Priestress of >>High Strangness". >>After reading her book, I contacted Mrs. de Brosses. I told her >>I wanted to draw possible links with a RR4 case I was then >>investigating in France in hope to get factual info about a RR4 >>file she claimed to have investigated in Canada. >>The case dealt about a visibly drug addicted and deranged woman >>who presented herself under the nickname of "Sarah (not, mind >>you, Elizabeth!) Smith" and my curiosity dealt about pictures >>that experiencer said to have made. I'm sorry to have to say >>Mrs. de Brosses proved herself less than cooperative and bluntly >>refused to answer my questions or even discuss the matter, even >>after repeated morte and more polite trials on my side, under >>the provision that "I'd been perversely and offensively >>attacking her". >>That's why, Ms. Kasten, I completely agree with you. What has >>the sympathy credit Mr. G. Bourdais may, for whatever reason(s) >>he has regarding his old friend Mrs des Brosses, to do with the >>"Lina Cortile" affair and what Mrs. Rainey has to tell us about >>the bias and pre-conceptions of her former husband's so-called >>"scientific investigation"? >To Franck and the List >Here we go again, this time with Franck Boitte! I wanted to quit >the debate but I cannot let this pass. >Mr Boitte: Marie-Therese was quite wise not to answer you, as >everybody can see on reading your comical post. >Talking about "gurus", I recall that you once told me that >Jacques Vallee was one of the ten greatest men of the 20th >Century! With worshipers like you, he is the one who deserves >the titles of guru and "priest of high strangeness". >As for Marie-Therese, here is, again her message of support of >Budd Hopkins:, at Alien Jigsaw: >http://tinyurl.com/3vhp49p >----- >"I have been deeply shocked by Carol Rainey's article and don't >want to review it here in detail; however, what I can say is that I >am an old friend of Budd's (since 1992). I have witnessed his work >and I have been impressed by his behaviour, and I know that he is >very careful when he works with abductees. This is not just a >compliment from a friend: I have had the opportunity to validate >this in many cases. I also say this as someone who has spent seven >years studying at Paris University and who has also spent many >years studying this disturbing phenomenon. >Budd not only spent hours and hours discussing the subject with >me, but he also allowed me to join him in his support group. He >showed me videos of his regression sessions and I was able to >see - firsthand -- how he carefully avoided leading questions. He >also allowed me to speak directly with some of his abductees >without being present so they were able to feel comfortable in >their conversations with me. >Budd is a very dedicated person whose aim is not to make money! I >always saw him giving his time generously without ever asking for >any payment. His goal was, and always has been, to understand the >phenomenon and to try to help people. >Budd had the courage to open this Pandora's box, and I am among >those who want this important work continue." >-- Marie-Therese de Brosses, Author and Investigative Journalist Once again, yet another person - who has not viewed Rainey's film - has a comment completely off the point of discussion. Budd Hopkins was deceived by a grifter. Not the first time a researcher was lead a stray by a _volunteer_. How many times have you been deceived, Glidas, because you were so focused on _getting at the truth_? Is that what is going on here? The fact that you need to pretend you always know your _reporter of an event_ down to their very toes? Give it up! KK Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp