UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2011 > Apr > Apr 9

Re: Priests Of High Strangeness - II

From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 10:45:18 +0200
Archived: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 12:55:04 -0400
Subject: Re: Priests Of High Strangeness - II

>From: Carol Rainey <csrainey2.nul>
>To: post.nul
>Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 12:54:44 -0400
>Subject: Re: Priests Of High Strangeness - II

>>From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul>
>>To: <post.nul>
>>Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 10:53:22 +0200
>>Subject: Re: Priests Of High Strangeness - II

>>This is not what I wrote. The case is not wrapped up and proven,
>>either way, it seems to me.

>>You say it is proven to be false and my opinion is you are

>>>From: Carol Rainey <csrainey2.nul>
>>>To: post.nul
>>>Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 11:23:51 -0400
>>>Subject: Re: Priests Of High Strangeness - II


>>>This is your implied summary of what it takes to do UFO
>>>abduction research: it's gotta _feel_ good.

>>>Let me paraphrase how you assess the validity of the Brooklyn
>>>Bridge Case (1989):

>>>"I like Mr.X and I have warm fuzzies for Ms. Y. Therefore my
>>>gut feelings about these perfectly nice people makes me 100%
>>>convinced that their reports of an extravagant abduction story
>>>that goes on for 12 years, involves casts of hundreds, both in
>>>the skies and on the ground, secret service agents, bugged
>>>telephones, chases through Lower Manhattan, top international
>>>diplomats, extraterrestrials with intentions of making their
>>>presence known to the world, the oversight of George Bush I, the
>>>Pope, and the CIA and FBI, the principal character's ongoing
>>>romance with a shadowy, never-seen government agent named
>>>Richard-which romance began in childhood and continued through
>>>production of a child (possibly)-all this and more I am willing
>>>to accept as a given.


>Perhaps the mis-communication is due to your use of a non-native
>language. I was _paraphrasing_ (interpreting) your argument to
>Kathy: you felt the Cortile case seemed valid because you liked
>the people involved in it.

Carol, Kathy and the List,

I understand you very well. You are the one who is caricaturing

>And, please, point out exactly where I said that the case is
>_proven_ to be false? I have never said that. My investigation
>of and film about the case are not completed yet. When they are,
>I'll let you know.

It's going to be a big surprise, no doubt.

BTW, Linda Cortile has written a letter to you, published on Kay
Wilson's site:


If you want to carry on with your campaign, it's your choice,
but I see for myself how unfair you can be, so I stop the
discussion here.

Gildas Bourdais

Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com