From: Jerome Clark <jkclark.nul> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 08:25:07 -0500 Archived: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:14:20 -0400 Subject: Re: Again The ETH Is A Scam >From: Jeff Ritzmann <jeff.ritzmann.nul> >Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 12:51:45 -0400 >To: post.nul >Subject: Re: Again The ETH Is A Scam >>From: Jerome Clark <jkclark.nul> >>To: <post.nul> >>Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 10:38:36 -0500 >>Subject: Re: Again The ETH Is A Scam >>>From: Greg Boone <Evolbaby.nul> >>>To: post.nul >>>Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 23:01:09 EDT >>>Subject: Again The ETH Is A Scam >>I'm sorry if I go against the grain again regarding the ETH. >>I wrote an article about how bogus this theory was and got >>trying to save the Earth. >Do you define "contactees" as those who have alien encounter >experiences i.e. medical procedures, implants, hybridization, >etc... or are you referring to contactees in the sense of Meier, >or Adamski and their ilk? My definition of contactees is the standard, ordinarily understood one: those who claim prolonged interactions with benevolent, long-winded Space Brothers in remarkably low- strangeness narratives. (The average contact claim reads like science fiction written by somebody who's neither imaginative nor intelligent.) It's also the definition Greg Boone was using. I was not referring to CE3s, which have their own character and history. I am unsure whether abductions are a variety of CE3, but except in rare cases abductions appear to resemble CE3s more than they do contact claims. My suspicion is that most abduction reports are neither, but that's another story. Jerry Clark Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp