From: Carol Maltby <carolmaltby.nul> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 09:35:35 -0400 Archived: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:16:33 -0400 Subject: Re: Greer's C-Seti In Rio Rico >From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 14:01:12 -0300 >Subject: Re: Greer's C-Seti In Rio Rico >Well, Greer is certainly no help to the study of this >phenomenon, but more of a major embarrassement. >These red lights, as you have described, are non-standard (ICAO) >navigation lights. Even if military, they have to display the >proper lighting configuration while in civilian airspace. >ICAO standard light is, red-left, green-right, white to the >rear. Each light must display 120 degrees (covering the full >360). They don't have to strobe or flash - that is done to >heighten the aircraft's visibiliy. >Red lights on the bottom must strobe and are required for night >flying or Instrument Flight Rules. This configuration allows the >pilot in a closing aircraft to determine his or her orientation >to the aircraft approached. It is obvious then why standard >lighting must prevail. >The only thing I can think of that close to the border is one of >the 2 UAVs the Arizona State government purchased for border >control. But displaying four red lights is still illegal and >dangerous. What studies have there been that concentrate on collecting and analyzing the characteristics and locations of lights seen on the various shapes of apparently structured objects? Carol Maltby Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp