From: John Rimmer <johnrimmer.nul> Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:06:24 +0000 (GMT) Archived: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 08:47:26 -0400 Subject: Re: BBC Article On UFOs >From: Dave Haith <visions1.nul >To: UFO UpDates <post.nul >Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:16:10 +0100 >Subject: Re BBC Article On UFOs >Commenting on the BBC program with David and Redpath on Facebook, >Jim says: >David, I will post what I posted on the Justice for Bentwaters >Site in response to this crazy thing. >Thanks for the info on the "fringe" Rendlesham debunkers. I am >not sure what the motivation is. Can't they get on TV or do a >radio show on anything other than Rendlesham. Well I believe >that they concentrate on Rendlesham, because after ...30 years >of scrutiny and debunking they still cant disprove it. You would >think a debunker worth his salt, could put this to rest and >disprove the evidence which has been released. Could anybody explain to me what would be accepted as 'disproving' Rendlesham? -- John Rimmer Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp