From: Stanton T. Friedman <fsphys.nul>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:02:55 -0400
Archived: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:24:10 -0500
Subject: Re: 'Fourth Kind' Movie Review


>From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul>
>Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:14:58 -0500
>Subject: Re: 'Fourth Kind' Movie Review

>>From: John Velez <jvelez49.nul>
>>To: post.nul
>>Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:53:36 -0500
>>Subject: Re: 'Fourth Kind' Movie Review

<snip>

>Most researchers who've been at this for a few decades believe
>that most, if not all, of the MJ-12 documents have failed to
>provide any provenance and or supporting evidence. But their
>credibility has been promoted through numerous UFO documentaries
>by their proponents on the History Channel.

Steve,

I would surely like to see data to support the above claim re
MJ-12 Documents.

I believe that I have done more research on the MJ-12 documents
than anybody else and written more and provided a great deal of
supporting evidence showing that the EBD,TF,CT, and SOM 1.01 are
legitimate and a whole host more are not.

Surely you realize that if these are legitimate, that the one
who filmed and then sent them has broken the law, and is the one
at risk. How could he or she go public?

On the other hand where is the hoaxster saying "Gotcha"? How did
the hoaxster know all those details that weren't known to be
true until well after the documents were received.

If I haven't covered and rebutted your "factual" objections in
my books and papers, please put them in writing. Research by
proclamation is hardly scientific.


Stan Friedman



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

At:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/subscribers/

Your access info works there too...

These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.