From: Greg Boone <Evolbaby.nul>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:34:04 EST
Archived: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:48:00 -0400
Subject: Re: The Dudley's Merry Hill UFO Video


>From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul>
>Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:35:43 -0400
>Subject: Re: The Dudley's Merry Hill UFO Video

>>From: Greg Boone <Evolbaby.nul>
>>To: post.nul
>>Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:17:38 EDT
>>Subject: Re: The Dudley's Merry Hill UFO Video

>>>From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul>
>>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul>
>>>Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:33:47 -0300
>>>Subject: Re: The Dudley's Merry Hill UFO Video

><snip>

>>We know what we've seen, touched, photographed. I have a huge
>>family in the U.S. we were here way before there was a U.S. we
>>work in all branches of government and society and we
>>communicate. There are names of forebearers on monuments going
>>back to the Revolutionary War for their service. New ones from
>>Iraq and Afghanistan. Like you I do things the old fashioned way
>>by asking and going to see for myself. I trust the collected
>>phenomena and when all the pieces fit it says something is
>>there. I also trust my own senses especially when there are
>>others present. Just because the others present don't trust our
>>own government, press, and people in the UFO field doesn't mean
>>that data doesn't exist. It takes manners, trust, and time.


>Just so we are clear, your take on - just for example - the
>Hudson Valley of the early 1980s event is that these were top
>secret American aircraft? Barring that, some of these were top
>secret aircraft of some other country on this planet? In other
>words what we call the UFO phenomenon is simply US technology on
>the march or again that of some other country? So, case solved
>for you?

I have no idea where you come up with these off the rail
extrapolations.

The aircraft are real. I've been told to my face two different
stories of their origins. One is that they're ours but top
secret, another is that they are not ours which means they're
somebody else's.

That means they're from another country or some other source if
we're to believe the sources. I went to the history books to
study up on the flying wing technologies of the past 100 years.
I drove the JPL and NASA guys crazy with UFO inquiries as well
as the aviation experts from dozens of countries. Since you're
hatted in the history of aviation here are two links that have
data that you can easily recognize and do some digging yourself
regarding the flying wing tech.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nurflugel/

http://tinyurl.com/horten-nurflugels

You should easily recognize some of the names on that list and
if not just introduce yourself and you should make some awesome
friends who are equally as interested and working in the
aviation industry. The sites are highly technical but also have
a vast amount of valuable aviation, aeronautics history. It's
really a treasure trove for fans and enthusiasts alike.

So again, the bottom lines are, these delta winged and triangle
craft are real. Whom they belong to has been debated and
official sources say they're not in the U.S. arsenal but
unofficial sources say otherwise. We've seen in historical
disclosure before that top secret craft the public thought were
UFOs were actually experimental and operational craft of top
secret origin Like the SR 71 and our own Stealth Bomber.

There's no telling what technologies we have as secret and I
wouldn't disclose them if I knew about them. Why tell the enemy?
My best knowledge says that if push came to shove I personally
wouldn't be worried about the U.S. being able to defend itself
and I'm glad about that.

UFOs are just that, unidentified flying objects. You know as
well as I that there are several theories as to the origin of
some of these UFOs. Some theories are popular and acceptable and
some aren't, however just like in theoretical physics, physical
anthropology, astronomy and any area of research that the new
idea or theory, like the theory that man could achieve sustained
flight, often face the gauntlet of the status quo who either
can't think outside of the box or won't think out of the box.
Remember how the NY Times stated that manned flight and the Moon
landings were unachievable? How about the developement of
nuclear fission or quantum mechanics?


Best,

Greg
ufomafia.com



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

At:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/subscribers/

Your access info works there too...

These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.