From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 20:28:23 +0100
Archived: Wed, 06 May 2009 18:30:00 -0400
Subject: Invisibility Cloak [was: Debunkers & ETH]


>From: David Rudiak <drudiak.nul>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul>
>Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 18:27:54 -0700
>Subject: Re: Debunkers & ETH

>>From: Michael Tarbell <mtarbell.nul>
>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul>
>>Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 10:40:55 -0600
>>Subject: Re: Debunkers & ETH

<snip>
>>For example, the "disappearance" of a nuts-and-bolts craft does
>>not necessary imply a violation of conservation of mass or
>>energy, but only that a formerly visible object is now
>>invisible (which is already within grasp of human technology
>>for limited EM bandwidths).

>>Likewise, should this object "almost instantly" reappear
>>elsewhere (in such time, say, as to imply superluminal
>>velocity), one might consider the possibility that there is
>>more than one object involved, before summarily abandoning the
>>principles of special relativity.

>Another simple and conventional explanation for sudden
>disappearance, compatible with other observations, is that UFOs
>can exhibit very high accelerations on the order of 100g or 100
>times earth gravity.  (See, e.g., Paul Hill's book, where he
>thinks this may explain sudden UFO disappearance.)

<snip>

Right to both...

Don Berliner, of Alexandria VA, was interested in the
discussion, enough to mail this idea (quoted with his
permission) -

[Quotation Begins]

Visualize a disc-shaped craft with a row of videocameras
positioned along a line from the top-center to the rim, around
the bottom and back up to the top- center.

Each camera points directly outwards from the center of the
craft, and displays its pictures 180 degrees from the direction
at which it is pointed.

If you are directly underneath the craft and the top-center
camera is on, you will see the sky above the craft displayed on
its bottom, rather than seeing the bottom of the craft, thus
rendering the craft 'invisible'.

This would hold true for persons viewing it from any other
direction.

[Quotation Ends]

Was happy to agree with Don about the basic concept, because,
remembering that 'invisibility cloak' in recent news articles,
our technology is continually showing us things we would've
thought 'magic' or 'against the laws of nature' only a few years
before.

We should maybe keep that in mind.


Cheers

Ray D



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

At:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/subscribers/

Your access info works there too...

These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.