From: Alfred Lehmberg <alienview.nul>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:25:56 -0500
Archived: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:31:50 -0400
Subject: 20 Questions SDI #467


SDI #467

20 Questions stalwartly 'Canad-iated' by Dave Furlotte, Chris
Styles, and Chris Rutkowski as compellingly introduced, expertly
orchestrated, and otherwise addressed by Maestro Canad-ioso
Errol Bruce-Knapp:

1. Are there more cops chasing UFOs and should the occupants of
same speak to the police if pulled over?

2. Why is a policeman the better witness to a UFO?

3. What are the Ufological consequences of more people with cell
phone cameras?

4. Does official authority regularly change stories about UFOs
to fit emergent facts?

5. Are there more UFOs presently... or more cell phones
capturing what's always been there?

6. Is the mainstream reporting more UFOs... because lay persons
are reporting more UFOs via cell pone, YouTube, and Twitter?

7. Are military aircraft still attacking UFOs the way UFOs were
attacked in the 1950s as a result of shoot down orders then in
effect as per Feschino in Shoot Them Down ?

8. Are more reports of UFOs coming from commercial pilots than
ever before?

9. Is it really "only matter of time" before there is a huge
public outcry from the citizenry regarding just what in hell is
flying so strangely in our skies, pray tell, as pursued by the
police and military aircraft all the way from simple observation
helicopters to armed F-16s?

10. If UFOs do not exist, or are in fact merely an inert
"unidentified aerial phenomena" without import or any special
interest -by official report beneath significance- what is being
pursued and _unsuccessfully_ interdicted by police and military
aircraft... as diverse as light observation helicopters and
armed F-16s?

11. Are UFOs a threat to public safety?

12. How is getting Al Capone on his income taxes like disclosing
UFOs because they are a threat to civil airplanes?

13. Is the flow of information with regard to UFOs largely
un-controlled?

14. Is it true that the government and the military have no real
control over information transmission?

15. When is a UFO, a UAP - a UFO?

16. What's the "Dirty Water", really, for?

17. Is Shag Harbor, and other documented maritime close
encounters of the "woo-woo" kind, evidence of a hazard to
maritime public safety?

18. How does a demonstrated encounter like Shag Harbor slip
through the cracks of a conscientious history?

19. Was there a Canadian Law Enforcement presence witnessing the
Shag Harbor event?

20. What was the sparkling yellow foam afloat on the water of
same?


Verily, with 70 plus minutes _remaining_ at this point, the
"barragrugous Zot" continues unabated and with no small vigor,
reader! Styles rocks on unimpeded by the smallest hesitation to
outline only the facts of the _highest_ strangeness! Then
Rutkowski rolls out legitimate all timers, eclipsing all gone
before! Not for the institutionally faint of heart unless you're
interested in finally bringing those barriers down and
discounting a little ego. Though, any of us can use a little of
that if current events show that to be true, at all.

The Toad is known by more and more! Know the toad!

Ufological sensibilities empowered are the listener's own!
Listen!

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/

alienview.nul
www.AlienView.net
AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com

Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

At:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/subscribers/

Your access info works there too...

These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.