From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 19:25:22 -0000
Archived: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:54:44 -0500
Subject: Re: Discreditation Of Ufology


>From: Franklin Fields <fields.nul>
>To: post.nul
>Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:02:08 -0500 (EST)
>Subject: Re: Discreditation Of Ufology

<snip>

>My main point is that PSY-OPS are real. It is easily discovered
>in main stream history and contemporary literature. As a U.S.
>Military Officer I was trained on aspects of its use. Go to the
>U.S. Army recruiting web site and see that they are looking for
>a few good men to keep up the effort. See site:

>http://www.bragg.army.mil/psyop/psyopintro.htm

>I have said this on the List before but I will say it again,
>serious UFO researchers should consider the possibilities.
>Considering PSY-OP usage is not akin to being a conspiracy
>theorist. It should be part of the job description for a serious
>investigator.

Hello List,

No-one should be nervous of the word `conspiracy'.

As one who looks mainly at the activities of public
organizations - that's gov't, law & judiciary, utilities &
roads, policing & edu etc - I promise you there's large or small
conspiracies in every big county in the UK (or State in the
USA), ongoing right now.

There always have been. It's just that the small and large
corruption / crime being covered-up differs over time, as do the
members of the conspiracies.

The tool which allows you to find them out is statistics.

Most of the statistical data you need are already in the public
domain or otherwise on record, but need research (they're
usually tucked away), others you might get from carefully
verified observation and reports.


Cheers

Ray D



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

At:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/subscribers/

Your access info works there too...

These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.