From: Eleanor White <ewraven1.nul>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:45:41 -0500
Archived: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:04:12 -0500
Subject: Re: Discreditation Of Ufology


>From: Joe McGonagle <joe.mcgonagle.nul>
>To: post.nul
>Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 13:58:28 +0000
>Subject: Re: Discreditation Of Ufology

<snip>

>What irks me is that some respected researchers [...]
>fail to be publicly critical when weak cases are promoted
>as viable. Groups stage conferences with presentations
>made by charlatans and proliferate weak cases by
>treating them as if they are worthy of attention.

A lot of wisdom in such comments. I'd love to ask the
documentary producers who choose weak cases (I know there are a
few exceptions) why they choose weak cases and avoid the strong
cases.

Brad Sparks made that weak case point very cogently, with
examples of strong cases, several years ago.


Eleanor White



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

At:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/subscribers/

Your access info works there too...

These contents above are copyright of the author and
UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced
without the express permission of both parties and
are intended for educational use only.