UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2008 > May > May 9

Re: SETI's Real Objectives?

From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 16:08:56 +0100
Archived: Fri, 09 May 2008 12:30:06 -0400
Subject: Re: SETI's Real Objectives?

>From: Stuart Miller <stuart.4.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 16:21:54 +0100
>Subject: Re: SETI's Real Objectives?

>>From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 17:26:21 +0100
>>Subject: Re: SETI's Real Objectives?

>>Also, looking at the military 'dis-info' imperatives imposed on
>>NASA personnel, presumably by another agency, we can realize
>>that the same has almost certainly been applied to SETI. There
>>_is_ a certain similarity in the knee-jerk responses from both
>>in recent years, have you noticed?

>I'm not being deleberately awkward when I say that no, I haven't. I
>would apply that to NASA as well. I think SETI are untouched by disnfo
>imperatives ( so far) and believe me, I'd be shouting if I thought

Hi Stuart,

As outlined in my last posting, most input on SETI's behavior is
necessarily circumstantial, but on this point we've got recent
text and video evidence, found accidentally, since I don't
usually check SETI `comment' stuff.

When an astronomer makes pointed and sarcastic comments about an
area outside astronomy, we might justifiably think he's either a)
an opinionated fool, or b) acting under orders.

BTW - we can watch an astronomer lying under orders - Hynek being
forced to make his `Swamp Gas' statement only hours after
admitting to local Sheriff Douglas Harvey that a) he had no
explanation of the multiple sighting; b) he had just received
orders from the Pentagon to `produce' an explanation.

It's about 2 mins into this 9 minute video:


Listers might've seen, in the last year or so, video and text of
Shostak making pointed and sarcastic comments about `aliens',
about UFOs and Ufology, and about ET hypotheses - all outside of
his area of competence, which is astronomy.

So - was that an opinionated fool or someone acting under orders?

I don't think Shostak is a fool.


Ray D

Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com