UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2008 > May > May 9

Re: SETI's Real Objectives?

From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 16:08:56 +0100
Archived: Fri, 09 May 2008 12:30:06 -0400
Subject: Re: SETI's Real Objectives?


>From: Stuart Miller <stuart.4.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 16:21:54 +0100
>Subject: Re: SETI's Real Objectives?

>>From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 17:26:21 +0100
>>Subject: Re: SETI's Real Objectives?

>>Also, looking at the military 'dis-info' imperatives imposed on
>>NASA personnel, presumably by another agency, we can realize
>>that the same has almost certainly been applied to SETI. There
>>_is_ a certain similarity in the knee-jerk responses from both
>>in recent years, have you noticed?

>I'm not being deleberately awkward when I say that no, I haven't. I
>would apply that to NASA as well. I think SETI are untouched by disnfo
>imperatives ( so far) and believe me, I'd be shouting if I thought
>otherwise.

Hi Stuart,

As outlined in my last posting, most input on SETI's behavior is
necessarily circumstantial, but on this point we've got recent
text and video evidence, found accidentally, since I don't
usually check SETI `comment' stuff.

When an astronomer makes pointed and sarcastic comments about an
area outside astronomy, we might justifiably think he's either a)
an opinionated fool, or b) acting under orders.

BTW - we can watch an astronomer lying under orders - Hynek being
forced to make his `Swamp Gas' statement only hours after
admitting to local Sheriff Douglas Harvey that a) he had no
explanation of the multiple sighting; b) he had just received
orders from the Pentagon to `produce' an explanation.

It's about 2 mins into this 9 minute video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inO1UCNqXTA

Listers might've seen, in the last year or so, video and text of
Shostak making pointed and sarcastic comments about `aliens',
about UFOs and Ufology, and about ET hypotheses - all outside of
his area of competence, which is astronomy.

So - was that an opinionated fool or someone acting under orders?

I don't think Shostak is a fool.


Cheers

Ray D



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

See:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/subscribers/


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com