From: Jerome Clark <jkclark.nul>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:45:27 -0400
Archived: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:56:00 -0400
Subject: Re: Abduction Explanations


>From: John Rimmer <j.rimmer.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:30:30 +0100
>Subject: Re: Abduction Explanations

>>From: Greg Sandow <greg.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:54:09 -0400
>>Subject: Re: Abduction Explanations

>>>From: John Rimmer <j.rimmer.nul>
>>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>>Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:16:59 +0100
>>>Subject: Re: Abduction Explanations

>I think not. The Fish 'Star Map' is a desperate attempt to provide some
>sort of 'physical evidence' for a case that relies entirely on the
>fallible recall of two distressed people.

Unlike you, John, I have no dog in this fight. I have no opinion
whatever about the alleged star map, but I am certain of this
much:

You have no more idea than I do whether or not the Hills's recall
was "fallible".  You just need it to be.

Me: hell, I _admit_ I don't know one way or another.


Jerry Clark




Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

See:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/subscribers/