From: Martin Shough <parcellular.nul>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:17:07 +0100
Archived: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:45:30 -0400
Subject: Re: Abduction Explanations


>From: Martin Shough <parcellular.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:01:39 +0100
>Subject: Re: Abduction Explanations

>Since you have read the book, and have been given the benefit of
>personal clarifications by Leir, perhaps you can tell us what was
>reported in the MIT lab analysis said in 1995 to have been due
>"in a few weeks" and the 2003 lab analysis of "Betty's" needle
>advertised as forthcoming "at a later date".


Apologies, Gildas.

As mentioned in my reply to John Velez I have since discovered
that the reprt in the former case appears to be the same
NIDS/NMTech report already discussed (it was confusing because
this analysis was described on the website as having been
assigned to MIT, not to NM Tech). So it's only "Brenda's" 2003
report which is not presented.


Martin



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

See:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/subscribers/