From: James Horak <jchorak7441.nul>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 06:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
Archived: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:43:00 -0400
Subject: Re: Surprise! Water On Mars


>From: Martin Shough <parcellular.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:51:32 +0100
>Subject: Re: Surprise! Water On Mars

<snip>

>And now I would like to hear about Mr Horak's research. Perhaps
>he would tell us the real history, taking a little time to
>justify his sources and to ensure of course that none of them are
>lying scientists.


Mr. Shough, I've written a number of submissions that have dealt
in depth with different topics, given names, references, and
been, in some cases able to claim the experience as first-hand.

I spent time doing so, and they were not accepted.

Of course, like you, I didn't conduct my research wholly online
but from personal records and investigations. It seemed the
better I did this, the less likely it was to be accepted.

The bad thing about referencing sources online is that you can,
with selectivity, justify any bent. I suspect this is what you
have done here.

Go to the library, review the subject card catalogue under,
Martian features detected as prominent in the nineteenth century
and be objective. It won't hurt.

But I'm not going to do that for you and then run the risk it
won't be posted. You opinion alone doesn't have that much value
to me and only getting it out to those to which I might directly
email it, doesn't answer well the challenge either.

Selectivity and integrity don't mix.


JCH



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

See:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/subscribers/