From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:01:05 -0300
Archived: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:06:04 -0400
Subject: Re: UFO Over Vizcaino Power Plant Baja Mexico


>From: Scott Corrales <lornis1.nul>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:13:48 -0400
>Subject: Re: UFO Over Vizcaino Power Plant Baja Mexico

>>From: Nick Balaskas <nikolaos.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 14:02:54 -0400
>>Subject: Re: UFO Over Vizcaino Power Plant Baja Mexico

>>>From: Scott Corrales <lornis1.nul>
>>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates.nul>
>>>Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 09:35:55 -0400
>>>Subject: UFO Over Vizcaino Power Plant Baja Mexico

>>>INEXPLICATA
>>>The Journal of Hispanic Ufology
>>>October 26, 2007

>>>Source:www.analuisacid.com
>>>Date: 10.25.07

>>>Mexico - A UFO At The Vizcaino Power Plant

>>>A report from Ana Luisa Cid

>>>This photo was taken at the Guerreron Negro 2 Internal
>>>Combustion Station, alzo known as Vizcaino, located in the
>>>Mexican state of Baja California Sur.

>><snip>

>>>UFos have been reported over CCI Vizcaino on repeated occasions,
>>>noting than in 2005, according to the image sent to me by a CFE
>>>attorney, a reduction in energy production can be noted
>>>precisely during the month in which three objects were
>>>photographed above a chimney.

>>>Therefore,it would be worthwhile to reconsider the hypothesis
>>>that relates unidentified flying objects with power generating
>>>sources.

>>>Images:

>>>http://www.analuisacid.com/vizcaino_2007.htm

>>I consider Ana Luisa Cid as Mexico's counterpart of Linda
>>Moulton Howe. Both are outstanding UFO reporters and prolific
>>writers but as investigators they are not as critcially minded
>>as they should be, often accepting any photographic or video
>>evidence for the reality of UFOs at face value when the evidence
>>they present is clearly evidence for the case against the
>>reality of UFOs!

>>The five luminous images or UFOs in the night-time photo of the
>>Guerrero Negro II electrical generating plant taken in February
>>9, 2005 is such an example - evidence for the reality of camera
>>lens flares!

><snip>

>Sorry you feel that way. I don't have your extensive knowledge,
>but I stand by the images that Ana Luisa Cid has uploaded. If
>they're lens flares to you, so be it.

Hi Scott, Nick.

Those aren't lens flares. They don't line up, there are two
instead of three"flares as ppossed to the three on top of the
tower-lens flares aren't selective. They aren't radiating spoke
wise around the lens.


Don Ledger



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

See:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/subscribers/