From: William Sawers <ufsyntax.nul>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:20:50 +1000
Fwd Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:56:31 -0400
Subject: Re: 40 Year-Old U.S. Military Conspiracy Revealed


>From: Joe McGonagle <joe.mcgonagle.nul>
>To:  ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 15:43:40 +0100
>Subject: Re: 40 Year-Old U.S. Military Conspiracy Revealed

>>From: David Rudiak <drudiak.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:43:47 -0700
>>Subject: 40 Year-Old U.S. Military Conspiracy Revealed

>>For those skepti-bunkers who assert that the U.S. government
>>and/or military couldn't possibly engage in a high-level
>>conspiracy and keep it secret for many decades, have a gander at
>>this chilling real-life 40 year-old conspiracy and treason of
>>the U.S. Joint Chiefs that has just come out:

>>http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page

><snip>

>Actually, this disproves your point. No matter how secret
>something is (and this is probably even more sensitive than any
>ET visitation), no cover-up is foolproof otherwise how would you
>know about this?

>How many people would 'need to know' about this short-lived
>secret? In comparison, how many would need to know about a
>secret that has been active for nearly sixty years? The risk of
>exposure in the latter case is probably in the order of sixty
>times greater.


Joe/List

I think you state this exactly right... The Roswell event hasn't
been covered up. It's been slipping out since Maj Marcel first
spoke out. When Col Du Boise wrote an affidavit saying the
balloon was a cover story.

It wasn't covered up. They tried to cover it up but as you say,
"no cover-up is foolproof, otherwise how would you know about
this."


William