From: Richard Hall <hallrichard99.nul>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 12:07:03 +0000
Fwd Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:17:44 -0500
Subject: Re: Peter Jennings' UFO Program - Hall


>From: Stanton Friedman <fsphys.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:16:03 -0400
>Subject: Re: Peter Jennings' UFO Program

>>From: Alfred Lehmberg <alienview.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 06:32:01 -0600
>>Subject: Re: Peter Jennings' UFO Program

>>Hall, Friedman, Swords, and Clark... the 'force' seems well
>>represented. Any word on who it is who fronts for the 'dark'
>>side? I hope Shermer is one of them... gives me an opportunity
>>to hoot and boo and otherwise carry on in an immature manner in
>>the privacy of my own home. <g>

>In a bulk mailing from Skeptic, Shirmer lists the Peter Jennings
>special as one of his appearances. Don Schmitt was also
>interviewed in Roswell last July. There were interviews at MUFON
>in Denver in July as well. What a collection of outtakes there
>must be.

>Stan Friedman

Stan,

That bodes ill for the quality of the program. I had thoiught
they were above the usual `sampler' of every kook or idiiot that
chances along, every uninformed debunker, every colorful
character, in favor of serious discussion of the hardcore data.
Let us hope they did some serious editing.

I personally bent the producer's ear about the history of UFO
documentaries, how bad they generally were, and why. And I have
been in touch regularly with the staff since then, supplying
them with all kinds of soldi information, documents,leads to
good witnesses, etc.  They will certainly hear from me loud and
clear if this turns out to be another hodgepodge,

Meanwhile I am hoping for the best but will expect the worst.


 - Dick