From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac.nul> Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 16:29:50 -0400 Fwd Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 15:01:30 -0400 Subject: Re: SEDENA And The Mexican UFO Question - Booth >From: Billy Booth <Ufocasebook.nul> >To: ufoupdates.nul >Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 21:42:41 EDT >Subject: Re: SEDENA And The Mexican UFO Question >>From: Scott Corrales <lornis1.nul> >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates.nul> >>Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 09:44:22 -0400 >>Subject: SEDENA And The Mexican UFO Question <snip> >Why is this relevant? Easy, the FLIR camera is a calibrated >instrument. It was set up by its manufacturer to register >thermal radiation sources at certain, probably "assigned" >temperatures. The video can be analyzed by the maker of this >FLIR device and a true temperature of the objects in the clip >can be determined. Why has no one suggested this? Knowing as >little as I do about Infrared, I feel this is a possible answer >to the de-bunkers. Have the video analyzed by the FLIR >technicians that calibrated the device. We will then have an >approximate thermal reading on the objects. Then, armed with >this data, the debunkers will crawl under their rocks. Th flir device is not a radiometer. It does register temperature, but in order to make a "pretty picture" it automatically changes gain (amplification) which means it intentionally "loses" the ability to record actual temperatures. The flir engineers will attempt to learn as much as they can, but they may not be able to get a direct measure of temperature from the equipment.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp