UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2004 > Mar > Mar 31

Re: The Phoenix Lights - Man Made Hoax Devices -

From: Kelly Freeman <Khfflsciufo.nul>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 18:56:32 EST
Fwd Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:32:16 -0500
Subject: Re: The Phoenix Lights - Man Made Hoax Devices -

>From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:46:21 -0400
>Subject: Re: The Phoenix Lights - Man Made Hoax Devices


>You don't sound like you've been at this awhile nor that you
>have read much. Your secret technology is a waste of time and
>naive. And how the US government wastes money on its bombers is
>irrelevant. You said, "But then, simultaneous secret programs
>couldn't be possible, could they? What does John Q. Public have
>the right to know, anyway?

>That doesn't matter, where's the proof. Either way there has to
>be some proof and I'm betting it would be a lot easier to
>disprove the secret technology hypothesis [STH] than the ETH.

>The ET hypothesis doesn't sit right with you so you are going to
>invent some brilliant technology that wasn't around in the 50s.
>Where did it come from? Look at the early aviation technological
>[I'm talking jets] development postwar II history in the states.
>There is none. It was imported, from Germany and England. Now
>you expect me to believe that during and before WWII there was
>some secret, advanced aero technology that no one knew about in
>the US?

>And aircraft always crash-especially when humans are flying
>them. Every model right up to the Concorde. And you_are_wrong.
>Save yourself some time and move on to a more reasonable

>If I sound trite it's because I'm tired of hearing the same old
>"secret US technology" BS on this List and others. It goes no
>further than the flying stovepipe SR-71, put-enough- horsepower-
>on-a-barn-door-and-it will-fly, technology. Even the B-2 was a
>knock-off of the earlier Northrup models and only about 300mph
>faster-thanks to Kevlar and more efficient jets. Shoe me some
>sophistication. Please.


Gee whiz, you're no fun at all. Sorry I brought this whole thing
up. But, unfortunately, we were sidetracked which is entirely my
fault. My original post suggested "...terrestrial in nature".
But please, don't throw accusations and insults just because I
happen to entertain a theory you disagree with. Good God! It is
just a theory! We could go on and on, but that would be a
waste_of_time. Hope we can have a more productive
discussion/debate on something else in the future.

Have a good day and may peace be with you always.

...Damn! What happened to those Great Airships anyway?


[ Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com