From: Stuart Miller <stuart.miller4.nul> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 16:55:19 -0000 Fwd Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 06:50:33 -0500 Subject: The Phoenix Lights - Man Made Hoax Devices The following is a short extract from an interview conducted between myself and Dr. Lynne Kitei, author of the book The Phoenix Lights, for UFO Review, a new on-line e-zine to be launched soon. The full interview will appear in the first edition, TBA. Interview date: 24th. March 04. Time: 11:00 pm GMT. SM is Stuart Miller LK is Doctor Lynne Kitei. SM: What is your reaction these days, now, when you still hear the word "flares" mentioned in connection with the lights? LK: Oh boy, that does get my ire. First of all, they weren't flares! That I know. It's funny you should mention that because last night, the three hour show (Coast To Coast 3/24/04) went so well and we were getting such wonderful callers, from all over the United States. It was just really amazing that all these people were up in the middle of the night listening to this and it was really comforting. I ve had so much positive reinforcement. The last caller though, this guy says, I know you were looking south so it must have been flares on the Barry Goldwater range . Well, besides the fact that if you just look at the data, there's no way these were flares because they don't act like flares. They defy physics, as we know it, as I've been told by numerous optical specialists. Flares cannot stay in a straight line, they cannot form formations, for sure, they're very erratic, they're white not amber. They have giant slope trails and they reflect. That's what they're used for; to reflect light on air. This didn't come up until a month after the USA Today article, when I know the media was just badgering, as we were, for an explanation and so they had to come up with something. The only real hard data that they had were the four videos that night of us looking south, so whoever thought it up was certainly very bright and could make a case because the video itself does not do it justice. It does not do it justice at all because they re white in the video; they flicker in the video which they do not do in real life. They appear smaller as well. People that want to feed into that explanation, do. Either they're fearful of the real explanation or they just can't deal with thinking about it and it's just easier for them to slip into a logical explanation. What's funny to me is that if you look at the data, there's just no way. It's comical now when somebody brings it up and some people are very hard set on it, I have to tell you. Like this guy on the radio programme last night. I also received an e-mail to that affect from a guy that's with the Snowbirds somewhere. These are the people that really don't look at the data. They hear an explanation; they jump on it and say, That's fine. Well what about the mile long triangular craft that everybody saw. What about that phenomena? To me it's just as important if not more so because thousands of people saw that as well, or lights attached to something, which is very similar to what I photographed, obviously. A number of people saw these orbs detach from the main object and go out into the environment, which maybe was what happened in 95 to my husband and I, and then re-dock. That we didn't find out about until over a year, in December, after the mass sighting when I went back to the negatives and tried to find the one with four lights, which I realised was actually from 95. It shows quite clearly that when the closed orbs were disappearing, and when there were three orbs there originally, one on top and two underneath, there were six lights in the background. Two of them disappeared as the top orb disappeared so that we saw four in the background when two were there. Then when there's only one orb, there's two in the background. So the same formation in the same location, disappearing in the background when we re seeing the closed orbs as well. It' s a little too coincidental. I can get into this for a while but the bottom line is it s happening world wide and other countries are much more open to it as well. The flare theory is frustrating to me only in the fact that some people feed into it. That's OK if that gives them peace. Everybody in their own time. If that explanation is justified in their own mind and they can live with that, OK. That's up to them.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp