From: Royce J. Myers III <ufowatchdog.nul> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 11:14:20 -0800 Fwd Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:34:08 -0500 Subject: Re: Hats Off To George Noory! - Myers >From: Larry Hatch <larryhatch.nul> >To: ufoupdates.nul >Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 07:05:32 -0800 >Subject: Re: Hats Off To George Noory! >>From: Greg Boone <Evolbaby.nul> >>To: ufoupdates.nul >>Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:53:09 EST >>Subject: Re: Hats Off To George Noory! >>>From: Royce J. Myers III <ufowatchdog.nul> >>>To: ufoupdates.nul >>>Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:48:09 -0800 >>>Subject: Re: Hats Off To George Noory! >>>>From: Greg Boone <Evolbaby.nul> >>>>To: ufoupdates.nul >>>>Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 03:56:36 EST >>>>Subject: Hats Off To George Noory! >><snip> >>>>If we're going to win this battle, it'll be up to you >>>>professional scientists and researchers to do what you do best >>>>and we in the media to provide the assistance necessary for you >>>>all to present your conclusions like Mr. Bruce-Knapp does and >>>>Jeff Rense and now George Noory. >>>>I for one will be tuning in every night to C2C with the comfort >>>>of knowing that George Noory has finally seen the light and is >>>>brave enough to put his foot down. >>>I've heard Noory in the past sound like he's had to bite his >>>lip with a couple of guests, you can hear the frustration in the >>>man from time to time. Perhaps he has had enough of the >>>BS-factor and enough of fools making the rest of us look like >>>fools with their utter garbage. >>>Now the question is: Is this the beginning or the end of >>>getting rid of the rubes? Hopefully, this isn't the end..... >>I'm with you on that Royce. >>Perhaps with a standard set by Noory last night it'll spread >>far and wide and will let people know that we're only interested >>in the goods not the soap sell. >>If you'd heard the responses from the listeners last night >after Noory resumed the broadcast you'ld be rest assured the >public agrees with it. >>Now, if we can only get rid of the childish snipes and weak >>attempts at character assassination we'd all be doing the public >>a better service and providing a series of ethics and standards >>that a field like this must have. >I heard that same broadcast, driving home from work. >I have to be a little less hopeful in this matter, and I don't >much like it this time. >The feeling I got, was that George Noory was hoping for >something that would put the radio audience on the edge of their >seats, and was disappointed when the perp all but clammed up. >I did not see this as a conversion of Noory to some sort of >allegiance to the 'truth', so much as sheer exasperation that >the BS was unevenly shared. >I don't blame Noory for dumping the huckster, he simply didn't >play by the rules. Don't forget the main rule: Knock up the >ratings or you're outta here. >This shaman refused to tell us when the End of the World was >scheduled. That's what pissed Noory off; not some new devotion >to high standards of radio journalism. >Anyone who relies on late night radio for the 'truth' about UFOs >or other controversial matters gets exactly what they deserve. This is a first for C2C: Last night Noory announced that he had actually engaged in, get this, checking out someone's claims - namely the claim of the two guests that they had visited the last of the Fatima bunch. Now, will C2C start checking out their other guests (i.e.: Dames, Morton, et al) and call them on their bull? It'd be nice to see, but I have to completely agree with Larry that the optimism here on the List may be too much to hope for..... Regards, Royce J. Myers III UFOWATCHDOG.COM "Don't Trip On Your Open Mind"
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp