UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2004 > Mar > Mar 14

Re: UFO Magazine Folds After Editor's Death - Burns

From: Max Burns <max.burns.nul>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 17:24:53 -0000
Fwd Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 10:00:38 -0500
Subject: Re: UFO Magazine Folds After Editor's Death - Burns


>From: Joe McGonagle <joe.mcgonagle.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 16:30:38 +0000
>Subject: Re: UFO Magazine Folds After Editor's Death

>>From: Stuart Miller <Stuart.Miller4.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 15:17:26 -0000
>>Subject: UFO Magazine Folds After Editor's Death

>>>From: Joe McGonagle <joe.mcgonagle.nul>
>>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>>Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:12:34 -0000
>>>Subject: Re: UFO Magazine Folds After Editor's Death

>>>>From: Roy Hale <roy.nul>
>>>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>>>Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 05:26:54 -0000
>>>>Subject: Re: UFO Magazine Folds After Editor's Death

><snip>

>>Try answering the point.

>>Why, in one post, do you refer to FSR in a derisable manner and
>>in another one laud it and tell us all to read it?

>>Which is it?

>Boy, this is hard work.....

>My comments were not critical of the publication, but of
>_how_people_interpret_the_contents, ie, accepting everything
>that appears on TV or in print as immutable fact, without
>questioning the depth of research, the motivation of the author,
>and sometimes even the rationality of the article amongst other
>things.

>Roy quoted "thousands, and thousands, and thousands, and
>thousands, and thousands of UFO sightings" to support his
>contention that UFOs must be extraterrestrial in origin (not
>extradimensional, extratemporal, or just mistaken
>identifications). I effectively suggested that he shouldn't
>simply accept the stories that he reads (eg in FSR or UFO
>Magazine) at face value without considering the questions
>mentioned above.


Stuart, Roy, EBK and Listers.

Nice explanation, however based on that logic the writer of this
post believes everything negative he has heard about me. Nothing
positive is to be listened to. The writer of this post is
believing his 'info', even though it has been supplied to him
by two researchers who are proven planters of dis-information
hoaxers, etc.

So I say, dont believe all you have heard especially when it has
come from people who are proven to be untruthful, who do not
even know me. Nor does the writer of this post.

Hey, its doesnt stop him believing all he hears when it suits
him.

Work that one out.

Max



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com