UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2004 > Mar > Mar 11

Re: Hoagland's Fossil Theory - Balaskas

From: Nick Balaskas <Nikolaos.nul>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:52:38 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Fwd Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:55:47 -0500
Subject: Re: Hoagland's Fossil Theory - Balaskas


>From: Ray Stanford <dinotracker.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:41:19 -0500
>Subject: Re: Hoagland's Fossil Theory

>>From: Chaz Stuart <Daydisk2.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:50:01 -0500
>>Subject: Hoagland's Fossil Theory

>>Don't laugh! I don't know about the "cover-up", but he does make
>>a rather strong case for this fossil being a crinoid relative or
>>"sea lily" stem:

>>http://www.enterprisemission.com/articles/03-08-2004/crinoid_cover-up.htm

>>(too many important, relevant pix to just post the text).

>Strong case? In your mind, maybe, but not in mine. I went to the
>webpage and read everything and examined the images. Not as bad
>as George A. Filer with his allegation of Martian writing on
>rock, but those Hoagland quotes are from poor observers and
>interpreters because their perceptions are clearly colored by
>what they want to see, in much the same way that they have
>artificially colored (not calibrated, but colored) the
>'blueberries' blue. Look how it distorts the balance of colors,
>extremely so in one of the images.

>They are as kids playing around with fake money and pretending
>they are rich.

>But, what's new? Hoagland has been playing that game for years
>now.

>And now we have George Filer playing a more extreme game without
>even the play money of simulacra. His claim of finding letters
>resembling ours on Martian rock is nothing short of
>unadulterated fantasy. With his pretentious silliness before
>reporters (as in recent days), IMO, UFO research needs no other
>enemies.

Hi Ray!

There are numerous examples of such "out of place artifacts" or
OOPARTs here on Earth, so why not on Mars too? Reference to such
things was made on Errol's UFO radio show last Saturday night.

Since Nature does seem to imitate Man too, it is not surprising
that such things will be identified in the Mars rocks by
careful, but not necessarily critical, observers. The human mind
fills in details or interprets the images we see so that the two
capital letters, E and G, although they are the same size and
interesting is not very compelling evidence of past intelligent
life on Mars. Never-the-less, such evidence should never be
selectively ignored as is often done by scientists just because
it goes against their beliefs or the currently accepted
scientific views.

Since you have much experience searching for and identifying
fossils here on Earth, I would like your opinion on what you see
in these images of rocks brought back to Earth from the Moon by
the robotic 'Luna' Soviet spacecraft. Do these look like fossils
to you, George Filer or Richard Hoagland (see web site below)?

http://www.panspermia.org/zhmur2.htm

Since the Moon is in Earth's backyard of space, these fossil
looking objects could very well be identical to early Earth life
that was blasted out into space from large meteor impacts in the
past.


Nick Balaskas




[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com