UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2004 > Mar > Mar 10

Re: Hoagland's Fossil Theory - Stanford

From: Ray Stanford <dinotracker.nul>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:41:19 -0500
Fwd Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 16:04:18 -0500
Subject: Re: Hoagland's Fossil Theory - Stanford

>From: Chaz Stuart <Daydisk2.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:50:01 -0500
>Subject: Hoagland's Fossil Theory

>Don't laugh! I don't know about the "cover-up", but he does make
>a rather strong case for this fossil being a crinoid relative or
>"sea lily" stem:


>(too many important, relevant pix to just post the text).

Strong case? In your mind, maybe, but not in mine. I went to the
webpage and read everything and examined the images. Not as bad
as George A. Filer with his allegation of Martian writing on
rock, but those Hoagland quotes are from poor observers and
interpreters because their perceptions are clearly colored by
what they want to see, in much the same way that they have
artificially colored (not calibrated, but colored) the
'blueberries' blue. Look how it distorts the balance of colors,
extremely so in one of the images.

They are as kids playing around with fake money and pretending
they are rich.

But, what's new? Hoagland has been playing that game for years

And now we have George Filer playing a more extreme game without
even the play money of simulacra. His claim of finding letters
resembling ours on Martian rock is nothing short of
unadulterated fantasy. With his pretentious silliness before
reporters (as in recent days), IMO, UFO research needs no other

Ray Stanford

"You know my method. It is founded upon the observance of trifles." --
Sherlock Holmes in The Boscombe Valley Mystery

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com