From: Chaz Stuart <Daydisk2.nul>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:50:01 -0500
Fwd Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:21:52 -0500
Subject: Hoagland's Fossil Theory


Don't laugh! I don't know about the "cover-up", but he does make
a rather strong case for this fossil being a crinoid relative or
"sea lily" stem:


http://www.enterprisemission.com/articles/03-08-2004/crinoid_cover-up.htm

(too many important, relevant pix to just post the text).


--Chaz