UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2004 > Mar > Mar 4

Re: NASA-JPL May Have Cooked Their Own Goose! -

From: Paul Anderson <paulanderson.nul>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:07:19 -0800
Fwd Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 16:19:21 -0500
Subject: Re: NASA-JPL May Have Cooked Their Own Goose! -


>From: Ray Stanford <dinotracker.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:50:55 -0500
>Subject: NASA-JPL May Have Cooked Their Own Goose!

>NASA-JPL has diagnosed the 'blueberries' as concretions formed
>within a wet substrate. Aside from a few of the spheres and at
>least one textbook splash-form dumb bell-shaped small object that
>seem to be composed of translucent glass possibly knocked up and
>frozen in flight by cosmic impact, my examination of many images
>of the 'blueberries' taken under diverse light angles suggests
>that they are right as to the origin of at least most of the
>'blueberries'.

<snip>

I think Ray might be right in his assessment. There are so many
of these things; the soil all around the crater rim and bedrock
is covered with them. They might be concretions all right, but
why so many of them, as compared to most earthly examples? The
vast number of them may itself indicate biological involvement,
a fascinating idea. Could so many have just eroded out of
bedrock in the normal sense? Squyres himself has said in earlier
JPL briefings that some spherules come from the bedrock (we can
see that) but that many probably do not. If the rover goes out
onto the flat plain and the plain itself is covered with them,
then what? Some of the pancam images I've looked at so far seem
to hint at that, but they may be clustered just around the
crater(s), we don't know yet. But soon now we will see. They
could still be just "normal" concretions, with no biological
involvement, but I think this hypothesis is an interesting
possibility at this point, that should not be dismissed too
quickly.

There are also similar ideas now regarding zinc spherules on
earth that can be created by colonies of microbes:

http://www.sciencenews.org/20031115/bob9.asp

Also, in this new Astrobiology Magazine article, they mention
how even the sulfate-eating bacteria can produce round spores
when they go dormant, with a photo of one, although those are
probably a lot smaller, not sure (no size indication given). It
includes quotes from Benton C. Clark who was in the NASA press
conference panel and seems rather open-minded to the possibility
of Martian life, at least in this form (see below):

http://www.astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=858&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

or

http://tinyurl.com/ytjvz

As for there being no biologists in the press conference panel,
as I've seen mentioned in various places - not quite accurate. I
found this reference in another forum for Dr. Benton C. Clark
(who presented the spectrometer results). His background is
biophysics and he chairs the External Advisory Committee for the
NASA Center for Research and Training in Exobiology at the
University of California San Diego and Salk Institute:

http://nai.arc.nasa.gov/video_archive/clark.cfm

http://stardust.jpl.nasa.gov/news/bio_bclark.html

There's a lot more to his bio than just Lockheed-Martin which
was mentioned in the official press release (and so the
reporters there probably didn't know this either).




[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com