|
From: Ray Stanford <dinotracker.nul> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:52:09 -0500 Fwd Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 07:41:23 -0500 Subject: Re: The Illuminati - Stanford >From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul> >To: <ufoupdates.nul> >Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 10:54:14 -0500 >Subject: Re: The Illuminati >>From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac.nul> >>To: <ufoupdates.nul> >>Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 18:43:21 -0500 >>Subject: Re: The Illuminati >>>From: Robert Gates <RGates8254.nul> >>>To: ufoupdates.nul >>>Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 02:12:13 EST >>>Subject: Re: The Illuminati >>>>From: Greg Boone <Evolbaby.nul> >>>>Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:34:22 EST >>>>To: ufoupdates.nul >>>>Subject: Re: The Illuminati >><snip> >>>This has been my point with UFOs over the years. Instead of >>>wasting time trying to get skeptibunkers to give the evidence a >>>fair shake; instead of wasting time to get some university on >>>the band wagon to do some scientific study, we within the UFO >>>field need to just go out and do it ourselves and not worry >>>about whether so called "main stream science" will get on board. >>Fortunately, that is exactly what some of us have been doing. >Are we defining everyone who isn't already a part of the UFO >community a "skeptibunker"? The field has been doing this on its >own for 50 years, but I'm not sure that much has been >accomplished. Somehow we have to reach out to mainstream >science, and we need to do it differently than it's been done in >the past. Steve, I wish all UFO researchers would take your advice to heart. Thanks for the suggestion. Any ideas on how that might be accomplished? I agree that "differently" is an important component. Ray Stanford "You know my method. It is founded upon the observance of trifles." -- Sherlock Holmes in The Boscombe Valley Mystery
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp