From: Ray Stanford <dinotracker.nul>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 17:52:09 -0500
Fwd Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 07:41:23 -0500
Subject: Re: The Illuminati - Stanford


>From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 10:54:14 -0500
>Subject: Re: The Illuminati

>>From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 18:43:21 -0500
>>Subject: Re: The Illuminati

>>>From: Robert Gates <RGates8254.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 02:12:13 EST
>>>Subject: Re: The Illuminati

>>>>From: Greg Boone <Evolbaby.nul>
>>>>Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:34:22 EST
>>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>>Subject: Re: The Illuminati

>><snip>

>>>This has been my point with UFOs over the years. Instead of
>>>wasting time trying to get skeptibunkers to give the evidence a
>>>fair shake; instead of wasting time to get some university on
>>>the band wagon to do some scientific study, we within the UFO
>>>field need to just go out and do it ourselves and not worry
>>>about whether so called "main stream science" will get on board.

>>Fortunately, that is exactly what some of us have been doing.

>Are we defining everyone who isn't already a part of the UFO
>community a "skeptibunker"? The field has been doing this on its
>own for 50 years, but I'm not sure that much has been
>accomplished. Somehow we have to reach out to mainstream
>science, and we need to do it differently than it's been done in
>the past.

Steve, I wish all UFO researchers would take your advice to
heart.

Thanks for the suggestion. Any ideas on how that might be
accomplished? I agree that "differently" is an important
component.


Ray Stanford

"You know my method. It is founded upon the observance of
trifles." -- Sherlock Holmes in The Boscombe Valley Mystery