UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2004 > Mar > Mar 3

Re: The Illuminati - Warren

From: Frank Warren <frank-warren.nul>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 13:55:10 -0800
Fwd Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 17:06:47 -0500
Subject: Re: The Illuminati - Warren


>From: Ray Stanford <dinotracker.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 21:38:06 -0500
>Subject: Re: The Illuminati

>>From: Frank Warren <frank-warren.nul>
>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 07:57:52 -0800
>>Subject: Re: The Illuminati

><snip>

>>Pardon the the interjection, but I wanted to point out that the
>>government "doesn't deny the existence of UFOs"; their official
>>position is:

>>(1) no UFO reported, investigated, and evaluated by the Air
>>Force was ever a threat to our national security;

>>(2) there was no evidence submitted to, or discovered by, the
>>Air Force that sightings categorized as "unidentified"
>>represented technological developments or principles beyond the
>>range of modern scientific knowledge; and

>>(3) there was no evidence indicating that sightings categorized
>>as "unidentified" were extraterrestrial vehicles.

>>(Conclusion of Project Blue Book).

>As for that (3), of course if they know it is, for example, an
>extraterrestrial vehicle, it is not unidentified, by definition,
>is it? Such are the semantic games officialdom plays.

<snip>

Ray,

I'll take it a step further - the afore mentioned points in
conclusion of Project Blue Book are "out in out lies!"

1). First and foremost, the government claims that "the
majority" of UFOs investigated, and evaluated by the Air Force
are indeed "IFOs," however; although the percentages vary, they
still by their own admission "don't know" what some are! That
being the case it's impossible to deduce whether they are a
threat to "National Security" or not.

2). I don't know how the Air Force's defines a "threat to
National Security," however; instances of UFOs penetrating
supposedly "secure" military installations, disabling nuclear
weapons, causing "evasive maneuvers by both military and
civilian aircraft, affecting the electronics of such, being
associated with the abduction of citizens, apparently
necessitating fraudulent public statements, to name a few, I
would think "falls under that category!"

3). By their own admission, from the beginning of modern
sightings, starting with "Foo Fighters," because of the
seemingly "advanced dynamics" of these UFOs, e.g., speed,
maneuverability, shape etc., these technologically advanced
vehicles instigated the investigation thereof.

4). In regards to their third point, and not even getting to
"close encounters," etc., there is no known "man-made
technology" that could duplicate the maneuvers of UFOs then and
or now, therefore; "Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter
necessitatem."


Cheers,

Frank





[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com