UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2004 > Mar > Mar 1

Re: The Illuminati - Boone

From: Greg Boone <Evolbaby.nul>
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 13:34:22 EST
Fwd Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 14:44:12 -0500
Subject: Re: The Illuminati - Boone


>From: Robert Gates <RGates8254.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 23:37:22 EST
>Subject: Re: The Illuminati

>>From: Eleanor White <eleanor.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:09:59 -0500
>>Subject: Re: The Illuminati

>>>From: Robert Gates <RGates8254.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 01:29:50 EST
>>>Subject: Re: The Illuminati

>><snip>

>>>>don't have either the first hand knowledge or the time to
>>>>debate this, I'm just passing on what I hear all day every day
>>>>from the shortwave shows.

>>>Alot of what is on shortwave radio is drival at best, so extreme
>>>care should be used when repeating it.

>>The shows I listen to usually cite their references, and urge
>>listeners to "not believe them [hosts]" but check the sources. I
>>would say that by far the greater drivel is heard from
>>mainstream sources, who often ignore real issues and fill your
>>TV screen, radio speaker, or printed pages with frivolous
>>nonsense. Many of the _opinions_ expressed on shortwave I don't
>>buy, but the considerable amount of cited evidence is more than
>>worth the time to listen.

>>The internal bombs planted in the Oklahoma City federal building
>>were one example of issues that never make it to mainstream
>>outlets.

>One point worth mentioning and its applies to UFOs and other
>unusual events. So often we hear reports of events (say UFO or
>otherwise) they are promptly debunked and discredited say like
>Roswell and you find out later that there really was something
>more too it.

>In the OKC bombing we were told after a monumentous govt
>investigation that Timothy McVeigh and a crony were
>responsible... end of story. Never mind eyewitness testimony to
>the FBI that other partys were seen leaving the area, never mind
>connection to White Supremecy groups were made blah blah blah.

>Now we have the main FBI agent (now retired) who was responsible
>for the investigation saying that the investigation was bogus
>and if he would have been in the same position he would have re-
>opened the investigation etc., etc. Apparently it appears that
>Timothy "Oswald" McVeigh had co-conspirators

>So the next time we hear some skeptibunker say "Well Project
>Bluebook said....." we know, as we have always known, that it
>may not be accurate, nor evidence may have been overlooked, or
>ignored.


Thank you Robert and of course you too Ms. White!

Robert glad you saw through all that OK City Bombing charade.

That's one of the reasons why I brought up the subject of
illuminati in the first place. I sat here laughing at the first
volley of negative responses just to see how stimulus-response
some people can be. Myself included!

I work in animation. We're also in a huge fight handling this
Disney/Michael Eisner debacle. It took Roy Disney and some of
our guys to literally fight from the ground floor up but we've
made waves! Miraculous, but again as soon as the revolt was
engaged there were those 'naysayers'. We'll see March 3rd on
that one.

I brought that up because often we'll hear or read something and
immediately lip-off that the originator is 'bringing down the
standards' or 'nuts' or 'seeking attention', etc. Yet here we
are on a UFO list!

I have a saying: " Everything is a crazy idea until it makes
money. "

On to these 'illuminati'. I've run into references and
confessions from reliable people and I had to look further into
it because it's all under the UFO issue. It's under and all over
tons of other issues too from health care to pet breeding! What
I had to come to grips with is there isn't just ONE illuminati
but numerous illuminati of various sizes and influence. There
are old timers like the Masons and their branches and religious,
political groups. Not all in agreement with one another and
often in opposition. The kicker here is how every branch of not
only our government but foreign governments and social
institutions are infiltrated and influenced by these people.

The dangerous ones are the ones who oppose change for the
better. As stated there isn't just one overall group but some
are so interwoven with one another they give off the apparency.
Some are old. Older than the term illuminati itself.

What we should be on the lookout for are those groups that are
using religion, politics, to control and arrest the growth of
creativity and science.

These are the real bad guys. It's like they're on some sort of
bizarre long term agenda for humanity to keep us in the dark and
at each other's throats. They get into government and louse it
up. They get into a religious institution and goof that up. They
get into ladies baking club and all the souffles fall. Y'see?
Some people get a leg up on knowledge and the first thing they
do is try to capitalize on it and beat down their fellow man.

Prime indicator of this low-brow behavior is the attack.
Especially of one's character or viewpoints.

Well that's what I've got to say. Next rant will be on how
dangerous our Legislative branch of government has become and
what we need to do to put a reign on our lawmakers.

Hint: I think that's where we'll all find the real reason behind
the UFO secrecy. Big time. :)


Best,

Greg





[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com