From: Dan Bright <ufo.nul>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:06:12 -0000
Fwd Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:01:47 -0500
Subject: Re: Whittlesea-Beveridge Photo - Bright


>From: Brad Sparks <RB47x.nul>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 02:45:38 EST
>Subject: Whittlesea-Beveridge Photo

>Yet despite all the various postings on this case,
>including Kodak DC240 digital camera data, not
>one single person has posted the FOV in Degrees
>or even raised the question of its absence from analyses until
>now.

How could anyone have posted the FOV if it is unknown? Of course
this is an important part of the analysis, and something about
which I'm sure many on this list have considered. Indeed, I was
planning on contacting Kodak myself for this very purpose.
Thanks for saving me the trouble.

>What is needed is the FOV measured directly from the camera used
>and an interview with the photographer so there is no uncertainty
>about what lens was used and at what setting.

Obviously. Which is why I'm trying to arrange precisely that via
Tony Cook (VUFORS). Please don't hesitate to post any further
specific questions that you'd like answered to the list. I will
ensure that they are included in my document, to be forwarded at
the end of the week.


Regards,

Dan Bright

--
www.theunexplained.info