UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2004 > Feb > Feb 19

Re: 1956 Lunar Path Light - Velez

From: John Velez <johnvelez.aic.nul>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:17:00 -0500
Fwd Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:24:08 -0500
Subject: Re: 1956 Lunar Path Light - Velez

>From: Amy Hebert <vanguard.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:56:32 -0600
>Subject: Re: 1956 Lunar Path Light

>>From: John Velez <johnvelez.aic.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:30:36 -0500
>>Subject: Re: 1956 Lunar Path Light

>>>From: James Oberg <joberg.nul>
>>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 07:18:23 -0600
>>>Subject: Re: 1956 Lunar Path Light

>>>>From: John Velez <johnvelez.aic.nul>
>>>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>>>Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 17:11:45 -0500
>>>>Subject: Re: 1956 Lunar Path Light - Velez

>>>>Has anyone mentioned the possibility that the bright object in
>>>>the photograph may be 'intra-atmospheric' and nowhere near the
>>>>surface of the moon at all?

>>>Am I the only one curious about missing data such as date/time
>>>of the image and the reported angular rate across the face of
>>>the Moon? Seems to me that obtaining such information would go a
>>>long way towards constraining the speculations that have been

>>Herr Oberg,

>>Ya know, part of the reason why I always call you 'Herr Oberg'
>>has to do with your 'brown-shirt' attitude toward myself and
>>others in regard to force feeding us what _you_ think we should
>>or should not be saying.

>>Instead of being so concerned about "constraining" my comments
>>maybe you should pay some attention to problems that are closer
>>to home, such as dealing with your own serious, (not to mention
>>rather annoying) 'control' issues.

>>If you were raised as a Christian you'll recognize the reference
>>I'm sure:

>Dear John, James, List:

Hello List,

In my last response to Amy Hebert this next paragraph should have
read as follows:

>Am I (or any one else) not allowed to respond _in_kind_ to snide
>remarks and insults? It seems like I cannot post a word to this
>list without _you_ jumping in and posting yet another unsolicited
>'critique' of it. Somehow it's ok with you if people throw insults
>around or consistently  misinterpret and twist the meaning of
>what I might say, but heaven forbid if I choose not to take it.

>If you don't like or understand what you read in a post... trash it
>and move on. Simple!

A piece of one of the sentences was cut off accidentally in the
original. I just wanted to post the correct version.

John Velez

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com