UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2004 > Feb > Feb 17

Re: Excalibur Briefing - Gehrman

From: Ed Gehrman <egehrman.nul>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:57:49 -0800
Fwd Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:57:30 -0500
Subject: Re: Excalibur Briefing - Gehrman

>From: Richard Hall <hallrichard99.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 14:06:02 +0000
>Subject: Re: Excalibur Briefing

>>From: Ed Gehrman <egehrman.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:55:31 -0800
>>Subject: Re: Excalibur Briefing

>>Could you define "weird science" and how does "weird science"
>>differ from regular science?

>As a former MUFON editor I was the recipient of some of
>Bearden's impenetrable, "scientific" writings. They were, as far
>as I could tell, all "trappings" and no substance. In short,
>classic pseudoscience. Pretentious and chockalok with vast
>arrays of mathematical symbols. Science at least attempts to
>explain, or to hypothesize and theorize, not obscure and


By "Pretentious and chockalok (chockablock) with vast arrays of
mathematical symbols" do you mean you couldn't understand it, so
you considered it crap and then dismissed it?

Maybe you couldn't understand it because it was you who couldn't
understand the science.

He does have a "PhD, MS (nuclear engineering), BS (mathematics -
 minor electronic engineering)" which indicates to me that he
considers himself a "scientist".

Below you'll find a brief excerpt from an article on his web
page. Do you consider this an example of "impenetrable,
"scientific" writings"?

Or is his writing just difficult to understand? I don't have the
answer since I'm not a trained physicist but this quote doesn't
seem much different from many scientific sounding pronouncements
made by mainstream scientists which are accepted as being true
by other scientists.

I don't see anything "weird" about it.



Reducing Our Dependence on Fossil Fuels
T. E. Bearden

Dependence on fossil fuels is a direct result of continuing
serious flaws in the classical electrodynamics (CED) model used
for electrical power system design and production. CED
eliminates what actually powers an electrical circuit, and this
error is still propagated by the scientific community nearly
half a century after the discovery of broken symmetry in
physics. The asymmetry of opposite charges means that every
dipolarity extracts energy from the vacuum and outputs a
continuous stream of observable EM energy. By correcting the
flawed CED model and its resulting electrical power technology,
a permanent solution to the energy crisis is possible,
significantly reducing the usage of fossil fuels and nuclear
power systems.

The source charge and its associated surrounding virtual charges
of opposite sign in the vacuum comprise a dipolar ensemble. By
its asymmetry, this dipolar ensemble absorbs virtual photon
energy from the vacuum, transduces it into real observable EM
energy, and continuously emits observable photons radially in
all directions The emitted energy establishes and replenishes
the associated fields and potentials expanding toward infinity
at light speed. This solves the long-vexing problem of how the
charge produces its associated EM fields and potentials and what
furnishes the input energy.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com