From: Ed Gehrman <egehrman.nul> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:57:49 -0800 Fwd Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:57:30 -0500 Subject: Re: Excalibur Briefing - Gehrman >From: Richard Hall <hallrichard99.nul> >To: ufoupdates.nul >Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 14:06:02 +0000 >Subject: Re: Excalibur Briefing >>From: Ed Gehrman <egehrman.nul> >>To: <ufoupdates.nul> >>Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:55:31 -0800 >>Subject: Re: Excalibur Briefing >>Could you define "weird science" and how does "weird science" >>differ from regular science? >As a former MUFON editor I was the recipient of some of >Bearden's impenetrable, "scientific" writings. They were, as far >as I could tell, all "trappings" and no substance. In short, >classic pseudoscience. Pretentious and chockalok with vast >arrays of mathematical symbols. Science at least attempts to >explain, or to hypothesize and theorize, not obscure and >obfuscate. Richard, By "Pretentious and chockalok (chockablock) with vast arrays of mathematical symbols" do you mean you couldn't understand it, so you considered it crap and then dismissed it? Maybe you couldn't understand it because it was you who couldn't understand the science. He does have a "PhD, MS (nuclear engineering), BS (mathematics - minor electronic engineering)" which indicates to me that he considers himself a "scientist". Below you'll find a brief excerpt from an article on his web page. Do you consider this an example of "impenetrable, "scientific" writings"? Or is his writing just difficult to understand? I don't have the answer since I'm not a trained physicist but this quote doesn't seem much different from many scientific sounding pronouncements made by mainstream scientists which are accepted as being true by other scientists. I don't see anything "weird" about it. Ed http://www.cheniere.org/toc.html Reducing Our Dependence on Fossil Fuels T. E. Bearden Dependence on fossil fuels is a direct result of continuing serious flaws in the classical electrodynamics (CED) model used for electrical power system design and production. CED eliminates what actually powers an electrical circuit, and this error is still propagated by the scientific community nearly half a century after the discovery of broken symmetry in physics. The asymmetry of opposite charges means that every dipolarity extracts energy from the vacuum and outputs a continuous stream of observable EM energy. By correcting the flawed CED model and its resulting electrical power technology, a permanent solution to the energy crisis is possible, significantly reducing the usage of fossil fuels and nuclear power systems. The source charge and its associated surrounding virtual charges of opposite sign in the vacuum comprise a dipolar ensemble. By its asymmetry, this dipolar ensemble absorbs virtual photon energy from the vacuum, transduces it into real observable EM energy, and continuously emits observable photons radially in all directions The emitted energy establishes and replenishes the associated fields and potentials expanding toward infinity at light speed. This solves the long-vexing problem of how the charge produces its associated EM fields and potentials and what furnishes the input energy.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp