UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2004 > Feb > Feb 17

Re: 1956 Lunar Path Light - Oberg

From: James Oberg <joberg.nul>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 07:13:49 -0600
Fwd Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:05:03 -0500
Subject: Re: 1956 Lunar Path Light - Oberg


>From: Nick Balaskas <Nikolaos.nul>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:24:37 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
>Subject: Re: 1956 Lunar Path Light

>If you cannot get this issue of JSE through the inter-library loan
>system, you should be able to get a complete reprint (including
>the amazing images of an object which looks very much like a
>classic flying saucer) ...

Isn't the use of the term 'object' the conclusion of a rigorous
study, which even the author admits has not been done? So
calling it an "object" from the beginning is presumptive and
biased, eh?
It's an interesting image, to be sure - whether it's an object,
or an imaging artifact, or a reflection, aye, there's the
rub..... I would be interested in seeing a copy of the article,
for research purposes.
My mailing address is
RT 2 box 350,
Dickinson,
TX 77539
I would like to determine whether the author interviewed any of
the witnesses or read any of the transcripts of the air-to-
ground and the mission debriefings, or viewed any of the other
imagery from the mission especially during this flight phase [as
well as imagery from other missions in similar flight phases].
And if the author did not, I am interested in his excuse.
I would also like to determine how the author decided my opinion
of the photograph without - as far as I can remember - asking
me.

Thanks!

James Oberg




[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com