From: Lan Fleming <lfleming5.nul> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:21:42 -0600 Fwd Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 14:45:50 -0500 Subject: Re: 1956 Lunar Path Light - Fleming >From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac.nul> >To: UFO Updates <ufoupdates.nul> >Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:06:32 -0500 >Subject: Re: 1956 Lunar Path Light <snip> >If the arc was actually moving, as claimed, then it would seem >to be anomalous. The angular length is 0.0005-0.0006 radians >approx. (very quick estimate... might be wrong!). I think that we also need to keep in mind that the "object" (if there was one) could be smaller than the telescope's resolution; point sources such as stars viewed without a telescope will appear larger the brighter they are.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp