From: Larry Hatch <larryhatch.nul> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 15:44:15 -0800 Fwd Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 14:04:44 -0500 Subject: Re: Off-Season UFOs - Hatch >From: Ray Dickenson <editor.nul> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates.nul> >Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 23:42:46 +0000 >Subject: Re: Off-Season UFOs >>From: Tim Shell <tshell.nul> >>To: <ufoupdates.nul> >>Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 10:28:25 -0800 >>Subject: Re: Off-Season UFOs >>Actually, violent crime figures have decreased significantly. <snip> >>>From: Larry Hatch <larryhatch.nul> >>>To: ufoupdates.nul >>>Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 02:35:11 -0800 >>>Subject: Re: Off-Season UFOs >>>If I ever come up with something statistically >>>interesting, good numbers pointing to a pattern, >>>I would have to think twice before going online >>>with it, for these reasons and others. >Sharp thinking, but probably wasted:- >a) if 'they' are really advanced the idea (in your brain) could >be expected to be visible to them; Ah! Lets presume they can 'read minds' as in some advanced technology that can see minuscule electrical impulses in the brain, through the skull mind you, and from some reasonably safe distance. Quite a trick. I forget how many billions of brains there are to read, lets presume they just look for UFO interested parties .. some large minority maybe. What would 'they' learn? Probably that there are as many thoughts, theories and impressions as there are minds to conceive them... including perceived patterns of UFO sightings. It sounds like a logistic nightmare, and 'they' may well have much more important things to do with their time resources. If I were in their shoes (do they wear shoes?) I would search the internet. Google might have some really interesting users if this has any merit! Its child's play getting onto the net anonymously. Bleep in a few keywords and see what pops up. Given the swamp of ufo "information" if that's even the right word, I would see such disarray of opinions and ideas that I would take comfort that few if any UFO students are really on to much of anything. >b) all past experience indicates `they' don't want to >communicate with Earth's "leaders" - rather the reverse; Agreed. >c) if you _wanted_ contact then demonstrating logic (and >therefore non-resemblance to our "leaders") seems a good >ploy. I'm not expecting or hoping for contact personally, that seems really unlikely to me. It would be inconsistent with their behavior to date, and with any unbiased study of this planet and its natural inhabitants. Maybe in the distant future, their studies mostly completed, and when we are ready for contact. They could soft-start a dialogue by sending something for the SETI people to pick up on, then slowly suggest that they or their probes are closer than some might have guessed .. Best wishes - Larry H.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp