From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac.nul> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:28:49 -0500 Fwd Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 15:09:19 -0500 Subject: Re: 1956 Lunar Path Light - Maccabee >From: Ted Phillips - I.A.I. <archaeoanom.nul-linc.net> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates.nul> >Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:26:21 -0600 >Subject: Re: 1956 Lunar Path Light >>From: Cap. Alejandro Franz <alfafox.nul> >>To: ufoupdates.nul >>Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 04:44:02 -0700 >>Subject: Re: 1956 Lunar Path Light >>I found that the picture of the moon is a fake. Maybe that's the >>ridicule your good friend was afraid of. If you see the part in >>which the other half side that is part of the moon couldn't let >>the stars show in the background as it does. >>See: >>http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/ufoupdates/listers/ted/images/lunar%201956.jpg >Those are not stars, they are dust particles and various debris >from lying around for 50 years - you need a course on >photography, my friend. I agree with the dust hypothesis (and some photographic noise, I presume). I am puzzled by the extremely bright overexposed(?) spot at the center. Without trying to scale the picture accurately I would guess that the arc is over 100 miles long.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp