UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2004 > Feb > Feb 11

Re: The Beveridge UFO - Ledger

From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:25:13 -0400
Fwd Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:27:23 -0500
Subject: Re: The Beveridge UFO - Ledger

>From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac.nul>
>Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 01:32:17 -0500
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Subject: Re: The Beveridge UFO


>But, let's face it, that is the Xtreme Xplanation. Before we
>make the flying ET leap we must be certain that neither bug nor
>bird not film flaw - nor a chance combination of all three(?)
>figure that one out(!) - could explain the image

>And, by the way, I'm not convinced its a bird or a bug! But I
>have yet to take the flying leap!!

Hi Bruce,

That's the problem isn't it? We are missing some information to
make a final determination-distance. It can be argued either
way - bug or craft.

Is there any way to make a determination of distance by using
focal length. I haven't looked yet [and I don't expect to find
it either] but perhaps a shadow on the ground might be in the
picture. The terrain doesn't leave much to be desired. It's a
grassy field, but not impossible.

Like you I have no problem with very high Mach numbers for UFOs
since there have been reports of such since the late 40s. The
bug hypothesis needs a speedy culprit to nail it down. Anyone
got one?

Is there and entomologist on this List?


Don Ledger

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com