UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2004 > Feb > Feb 11

Re: Review Of Sight Unseen - Gonzalez

From: Luis R. Gonzalez <lrgm.nul>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:51:14 +0100
Fwd Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 06:48:25 -0500
Subject: Re: Review Of Sight Unseen - Gonzalez


>From: Gildas Bourdais <gbourdais.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:40:51 +0100
>Subject: Re: Review Of Sight Unseen

>>From: Greg Sandow <greg.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:39:43 -0500
>>Subject: Re: Review Of Sight Unseen

>>>From: Nick Pope <nick.nul>
>>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>>Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 20:10:52 -0000
>>>Subject: Re: Review Of Sight Unseen

><snip>

>>Which, come to think of it, I suppose somebody might think,
>>given that on this list we've just had somebody confidently
>>declare that Budd tells his abductees that they've been
>>abducted. This somebody, of course, has had about as much
>>contact with Budd, his abductees, and his methods as I've had
>>with the Tasmanian royal family (should there be such a thing).
>>Hardcore UFO skeptics, I really must observe, may be more
>>regularly guilty of wishful thinking than any other class of
>>human beings I've ever observed, apart from tiny children.
>>(Well, some credulous UFO believers can be just as bad.) Just
>>look at Luis R. Gonzalez, and all his assumptions about
>>Katharina Wilson, which Katharina - a class act, if ever I've
>>seen one here - so patiently demolished.

>Thank you for all this very interesting information. It confirms
>what I knew already.

>Mr Gonzalez has just made on this List a demonstration of
>wishful thinking and a priori judgement, regarding the story of
>Katharina Wilson, whom we must all thank to have put the record
>straight. Mr Gonzalez is not in a good position to question a
>researcher like Budd Hopkins, to say the least.

Now, at last, I understand the mistake. All of you have been
thinking I was trying to explain away the missing time, and
consequently, all the incident.

Nothing would be farther from my intentions. There is clearly
missing time. Period.

I consider it to be below half an hour, but nevertheless, there
is. Of course, we will never agree about its interpretation, but
must agree to disagree.

What I was really trying was to explain away the alleged
subsequent teleportation from the pay phones to the luggage
reclaim area. Just that, nothing more.

Of course, if as Katharina said, when she talked with her
husband from the airport, she opened the conversation saying she
_was_ at the airport, her husband's answer makes perfect sense.
But from there on, I still maintain my position: no
teleportation there.

>Having finished to read his book, I confirm my opinion that it
>is a very intersting contribution. The last part offers thoughts
>about the question of genetic manipulations, and possibly
>related cattle mutilations.

So, Mr. Hopkins, after years of talking about hybridation
experiments with all those sexual variations (from plain "love
making" to sperm and ova painful extractions), now changes road
and maintain that the quid were instead all those "scoop marks",
collecting tissues to make gene tranfers.


Luis R. Gonz=E1lez Manso



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com