UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2004 > Feb > Feb 7

Re: Whittlesea Australia UFO Photograph - Ledger

From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 13:35:02 -0400
Fwd Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 17:32:06 -0500
Subject: Re: Whittlesea Australia UFO Photograph - Ledger

>From: Larry Hatch <larryhatch.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 06:12:10 -0800
>Subject: Re: Whittlesea Australia UFO Photograph


>I'm still trying to fix the position of the Sun, believe it or
>not, with respect to the objects in the famous photo.

Yeah I keep bleating away about this problem with the light and
time versus the direction in which the camera was pointing.
Something doesn't add up if the time stated for the photo taken,
is correct.

Again Larry... a bug? Why? In another thread I've addressed
"the-UFO- photos-captured-which-the-photographer-didn't-see"
question. Whether the photographer saw the object or not, is not
a real issue-nor a reason to discount the photograph. Consider
the speed of the object and the picture through a viewfinder.
Remember most amateur photographers don't use the viewfinder on
a digital camera, they use the little 1.5 inch screen. I defy
anyone to notice an object on that screen the size of this
thing. particularly if it's moving too fast to see.

Remember, radar can't see the B-2B bomber but that doesn't mean
it's not there. To quote Stan Friedman. "I've never seen Tokyo,
but I'm positive it exists."

The ambiguity of the human eye [and the brain that processes the
information] cuts in both directions.

Don Ledger

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com