From: A. J. Gevaerd - Revista UFO <gevaerd@ufo.com.br>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 08:22:18 -0300
Fwd Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 10:38:59 -0500
Subject: LMH Can You Prove Your Evidence?


Linda,

I know that you are not listening to me and that you don't care
much about what the truth is in this issue. I am starting to
worry about what is your agenda with Urandir, but it is entirely
your problem. However, you've been lying about some situations
involved in this dispute, either naively and because you don't
know the facts and have been misinformed by your new friend, or
you simply chose to lie about these facts even knowing what the
truth is. What is worst?

I consider that it is your right to support and promote Urandir
in this thing - I debate, but respect that. I entirely disagree
with what you are doing, which I classify as shameless, to say
the least. But it is your right to do what you are doing and
even get paid to do it. _However_, when you start lying about
things that directly involve me, it exceeds your rights and
becomes my problem. And I will not rest a single minute until I
have things cleared up. Please, be aware that I have the
necessary docs and info to support what I claim, and you don't.

If you have two minutes to spare, read the message below, that
I'm posting to 3,000 people all over the world this evening.

-----

Correcting Mistakes

I have just been informed about last Friday's Coast-to-Coast
show, where Linda Moulton Howe presented the "Corghinho Case"
(its still wrong on her webpage. It is Corguinho and means
'Little River'). I made the decision not to listen to it live,
as I knew that a lot of discrepancies would occur during Linda's
'investigation', either made voluntarily by her or naively. I
don't know George Noory but I guess he would agree that all the
info presented on his show should be legitimate and maybe he
doesn't know that some is not. And as a matter of ethics,
probably he would like to have both versions of this thing.

Well, one of the discrepancies just presented is that "poor, shy
and humble farmer" Urandir got several lawsuits from A. J.
Gevaerd. That is hilarious and another interesting piece of this
debate. Please, Linda, you should know better that our legal
system in Brazil has a very well updated website where this kind
of info can been verified. It is very easy. All someone has to
do is visit:

http://www.tj.gov.ms.br

and check out both names, mine (Ademar Jose Gevaerd) and
Urandir's (Fernandes de Oliveira).

Anyone can see that I am the defendant ("reu" in Portuguese) in
several lawsuits that Urandir has against me ("autor" in
Portuguese). Some lawsuits don't appear in that system, but most
of them do. So far, over 7 years, I have been object of 9
lawsuits from this cheater, every one of them very well taken
care of by my attorneys. The purpose of those lawsuits, along
with the threats and intimidation, pressure and campaign of
lies, is to silence me - and you see that I am not silent at
all. Urandir gave up on some of the lawsuits long ago and lost
two - the others are still under justice's roles.

I've never filed a lawsuit against him. Any serious journalist
should have verified that.

Even Urandir's lawyer entered a lawsuit against me and I am very
happy to say that as last Thurday I was officially informed that
I won that lawsuit, too. He demaned R$ 500 thousand - about US$
150 thousand - as damages to his moral image because of 'things
that I've said said about him'. Amazingly, his lawsuit had only
4 sheets of paper and was backed up with a xerox copy of an
e-mail from a third party. Well, Urandir's attorney not only
looses his client's lawsuits against me - as he lost his own.
Justice in Brazil may be slow, but it is fair.


A. J. Gevaerd