From: Luis R. Gonzalez <lrgm@arrakis.es>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 19:09:22 +0100
Fwd Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 18:11:42 -0500
Subject: Re: Trindade - Gonzalez


>From: A. J. Gevaerd - Revista UFO <gevaerd@ufo.com.br>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net>
>Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 08:13:47 -0200
>Subject: Re: Trindade

Mr. Gevaerd wrote

>The very same researchers, in Brazil, who analyzed the Trindade
>photos ruled out the Barra da Tijuca ones. To the same extent
>that Barauna's photos are absolutely legitimate, Ed Keffel's
>photos are a gross hoax.

Well, presently I am reading Irene Granchi's "UFOS and
Abductions in Brazil" (1995) and there she wrote quite strongly
about Ed Keffel's photos _not_ being a hoax.

Considering that she and her family had seen UFOs on several
ocasions (and I seem to recall reading that there was even an
abduction), my question is: How reliable are her investigations,
specially the one of Onilson Patero's abductions and
teleportations?


Luis R. Gonzalez Manso