From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac.nul> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:09:35 -0500 Archived: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:44:26 -0500 Subject: Re: Telescope To Challenge Moon Doubters >From: Trevor Seguin <dragko.nul> >To: ufoupdates.nul >Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:06:53 -0800 >Subject: Telescope to challenge moon doubters >Could they not just show you a computer rendered >moon, controlled by the real telescopes controls then just >leave the lens cap on? ;-p >----- >Source: The Sydney Monring Herald - Australia >http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/11/24/1037697982142.html >Telescope to challenge moon doubters >By Robert Matthews in London >November 25,2002 >Conspiracy theorists, you have a problem. In an effort to >silence claims that the Apollo moon landings were faked, >European scientists are to use the world's newest and largest >telescope to see whether the spacecraft are still on the lunar >surface. <snip> >Supporters of the conspiracy theory welcomed the news that >astronomers were to photograph the landing sites. But Marcus >Allen, the British publisher of Nexus magazine and a long-time >advocate of the theory, said photographs of the lander would >not prove that the US put men on the moon. "Getting to the moon >really isn't much of a problem - the Russians did that in >1959," he said. "The big problem is getting people there." >According to Mr Allen, NASA was forced to send robots to the >moon and faked the manned missions because radiation levels in >space were lethal to humans. Mr. Allen is an idiot. And yes, for the conspiracy theorist there is _no_way_ that anyone could prove that there were objects left on the moon.... other than sending the person there to see for himself and even that might not be convincing. He might believe that the trip was faked.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp