From: Jim Houran <JHouran.nul> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 07:10:15 -0600 Archived: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:29:32 -0500 Subject: Roswell Had Victims? >From: David Rudiak <DRudiak.nul> >To: <ufoupdates.nul> >Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:13:55 -0800 >Subject: Re: Roswell Had Victims? >>From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul> >>To: <ufoupdates.nul> >>Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:49:45 -0500 >>Subject: Re: Roswell Had Victims? >>>From: David Rudiak <DRudiak.nul> >>>To: <ufoupdates.nul> >>>Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:10:35 -0800 >>>Subject: Roswell Had Victims? <snip> I certrainly appreciate David's work, but my experimental work with Kevin Randle that was recently published in the peer- reviewed, scientific journal, Journal of Scientific Exploration, indeed demonstrated that the interpretation of the "memo" follows predcitably from the context assumed by the one trying to decipher the message. We found that by changing the context, words also changed. Interestingly, however, a few words did not change across various experimentally-imposed contexts. Therefore, it is clear that research on Ramey memo is not conclusive and that improved research designs need to confirm the findings of Rudiak and others before this document is cited as evidence (pro or con) in the Roswell case.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp