From: Tom Bowden <tomrbowden.nul> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 16:13:46 -0800 (PST) Archived: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:23:06 -0500 Subject: Roswell Had Victims? >From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul> >To: <ufoupdates.nul> >Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 12:57:28 -0500 >Subject: Re: Roswell Had Victims? >>From: Dave Morton <Marspyrs.nul> >>To: ufoupdates.nul >>Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:36:54 EST >>Subject: Re: Roswell Had Victims? >>>From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul> >>>Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:49:45 -0500 >>>Fwd Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 16:02:32 -0500 >>>Subject: Re: Roswell Had Victims? - Kaeser >>>>From: David Rudiak <DRudiak.nul> >>>>To: <ufoupdates.nul> >>>>Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:10:35 -0800 >>>>Subject: Re: Roswell Hhad Victims? <snip> >However, from the perspective of attempting to reach beyond the >UFO genre and gain some sort of respect for our work I believe >that using UFO researchers to analyze the Ramey Memo is the >wrong approach. >If independent analysts fail to come up with the same basic >interpretations that we have, then that needs to be addressed. >It may be that two groups of independant examiners would come up >with the same interpretation, which would lend tremendous >support. I absolutely agree. This is the proper way to go. It might be necessary, though, for the researcher to at least have some knowledge of the context of the document to be able to get a foothold on the selection of words and phrases from the lexicon. Just knowing that the note is allegedly a military telex would probably be enough. Tom B.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp